Patent Infringement

Patent infringement involves a two-step process. First, the the meaning and scope of the asserted patent claims must be determined. Second, the properly construed claims are compared to the accused product or process. See Aquatex Industries, Inc. v. Techniche Solutions, 419 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

 

The doctrine of equivalents extends patent infringement to insubstantial alterations that were not captured in drafting the original patent claim but which could be created through trivial changes. An element in the accused product is equivalent to a claim limitation if the differences between the two are insubstantial. Id.

Tags:
Trackbacks (1) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.arbusinesslitigation.com/admin/trackback/21915
Arkansas Business Litigation Blog - April 30, 2008 8:44 AM
Vestcom has filed a declaratory judgment of no patent infringement in Vestcom International, Inc. v. Information Planning and Management Service, Inc., No. 08-276 (E.D. Ark., filed 4/2/08). Vestcom provides shelf strips to Sears. According to the compl...
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?