Trademark Infringement

The Lanham Act provides a cause of action for trademark infringement. This cause of action exists for both registered marks (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)) and unregistered marks (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)). To establish trademark infringement, the plaintiff must show: (1) a valid trademark; (2) likelihood of confusion from the defendant's use; and (3) resulting damages.

 

Likelihood of confusion is the hallmark of trademark infringement. The Eighth Circuit uses a 6-factor test to determine likelihood of confusion: (1) the strength of the owner's mark; (2) the similarity of the owner's mark and the alleged infringer's mark; (3) the degree to which the products compete with each other; (4) the alleged infringer's intent to pass off its goods as those of the trademark owner; (5) incidents of actual confusion; and (6) the type of product, its costs and conditions of purchase. See Kemp v. Bumble Bee Seafoods, Inc., 398 F.3d 1049 (8th Cir. 2005).

  • These factors guide the analysis, but courts are not bound to a rigid application of the factors. No one factor controls, and different factors may be entitled to more weight in different cases.

 

Arkansas Trademark Law: Trademark cases are usually filed in federal court, but Arkansas has a trademark statute comparable to the Lanham Act. See A.C.A. 4-71-201, et seq.

Tags:
Trackbacks (2) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.arbusinesslitigation.com/admin/trackback/20938
Arkansas Business Litigation Blog - March 28, 2008 1:13 PM
The Eastern District of Missouri granted a temporary restraining order based on trademark infringement in Sensient Technologies Corp. v. SensoryFlavors, Inc., 2008 WL 762092 (E.D. Mo. 3/21/08). Sensient Technologies is the corporate umbrella that used ...
Arkansas Business Litigation Blog - April 30, 2008 8:47 AM
Candy Bouquet has filed a trademark infringement action against one of its former franchisees. Candy Bouquet International, Inc. v. McClendon, No. 08-340 (E.D. Ark., filed 4/ 17/08). According to the complaint, McClendon owned three Candy Boutique fran...
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?