Septic Easement Violates Restrictive Covenants

The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed judgment in Royal Oaks Vista, LLC v. Maddox, No. 07-542 (1/17/08).

 

The Royal Oaks Vista subdivision was platted in 1972. Among other things, the restrictions prohibited any "noxious trade or activity." In 2004, ROV filed a replat and began constructing a temporary septic easement across one of the lots. The manner in which the replat was filed violated the bill of assurances, but Maddox waited a year before filing suit in 2005. The trial court found the replat was invalid and denied ROV's defense of laches.

 

The supreme court affirmed. The Although ROV spent $200,000 building the septic infrastructure, most of this cost was incurred soon after the replat was filed. The delay in filing suit had no effect on ROV's costs.  

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.arbusinesslitigation.com/admin/trackback/57235
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.